Back to comparisons
Ch. 9

Depositary Liability by Asset Type & Fund Regime

Strict liability vs negligence standard, sub-custody delegation rules, and force majeure by fund type

CriterionUCITSAIFMD AIF (full regime)SIF / RAIF (AIFMD-managed)PDAOFI (AIFs)
Liability for loss of financial instrumentsStrict — must replace lost instrumentsStrict — must replace lost instrumentsStrict — must replace lost instrumentsN/A — PDAOFI cannot hold financial instruments
Force majeure exceptionNo — strict liability is absoluteYes — if external event + unavoidable consequencesYes — AIFMD standard appliesN/A
Liability for sub-custodian failureDepositary remains fully liableDepositary remains fully liable (unless liability discharged by transfer)Depositary remains fully liableN/A
Liability discharge to sub-custodianNot permittedPermitted if investor notified + sub-custodian acceptsPermittedN/A
Duty for non-financial assets (PE/RE/loans)Ownership verification — negligence standardOwnership verification — negligence standardOwnership verification — negligence standardCore duty — ownership verification + record-keeping
Cash flow monitoring obligationMandatoryMandatoryMandatoryMandatory (limited scope)
Oversight duties (9+)Mandatory — all 9+ dutiesMandatory — all 9+ dutiesMandatory — all 9+ dutiesLimited oversight — no full UCITS/AIFMD oversight duties
ManCo/AIFM can act as depositaryNo — structural independence requiredNoNoNo
CSSF approval required for appointmentYesYesYes (except RAIF)Yes
Written depositary contract requiredYes — mandatoryYesYesYes
Fund can issue/redeem without depositaryNo — prohibited since July 2023NoNoNo
Sub-custodian annual review requiredYesYesYesYes (for any appointed agents)
📌 Data sourced from Lux Investment Funds 2025, Chapters 9. Verify current requirements with CSSF at cssf.lu.